Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Fall 2012 Dealing with Racism Workshop

Title: Dealing with Racism Workshop

Term: Fall, 2012


Description: I created and conducted a powerpoint presentation for the Student Leadership Institute's "Dealing with Racism" workshop which took place on Tuesday October 16, 2012.

Learning Outcomes: Never having the experience of being a conductor, the following three learning outcomes were created to help me present the material to the best of my ability.  In addition, they helped me learn from the first workshop in order to do better in future workshop opportunities:
  • SWiBAT  Educate students about the sensitive topic of racism to the best of my knowledge, initiate discussions, and be flexible if the powerpoint presentation is not presented in order due to the flow of students' discussions.
  • SWiBAT Follow up on students' understanding of the material by asking questions, giving examples, and giving students chances to give their input.
  • SWiBAT Through the experience, reflect on my strengths and weaknesses based upon the feedback received from my audience and how well the workshop went. 
Assessment Rubric: You can access my assessment rubric at the following link: Dealing with Racism Workshop .In addition, here is the link to the presentation: Dealing with Racism Powerpoint.

Evidence:  Even though there are only eight slides to my time frame of an hour and thirty minutes, the students were engaged in my discussion questions.  Sometimes students went off topic to make their statements stronger but being flexible to change helped me get back to the flow of the powerpoint presentation.  In addition, whenever students asked me a question, I would answer with my point of view but would question their thoughts to challenge them with critical thinking.  For my first learning outcome, I give myself a "4-advanced" because I was able to fulfill all the requirements. 

My second learning outcome is a "4-advanced" too because I gave examples to every bullet point to make sure that the students understood the information.  To make sure that the students were comprehending, I asked the students for their interpretation of the information and/or to provide their own example.  By doing this, I was able to indirectly know if the material was foreign to them.  All students were asked to participate and all students were able to give an answer. 

The third learning outcome was given a "3-competent" because I did not reflect on my strengths, weaknesses, and performance until a couple of days after the workshop.  By then, it was difficult to remember how well I did and I could not recall everything the students verbally told me regarding my presentation.  Nonetheless, I used my emotions to base my performance.  For instance, I was not nervous which made me a better public speaker than usual.  Through reflecting on my performance, I was able to discover some of my public speaking strengths and weaknesses, as well as what I need to do to better prepare for potential future workshop opportunities. 

Reflection: I was very happy with the outcome of my first workshop.  I was a little scared of how my opening would affect the students.  I initiated the discussion by saying my name and asking the students to guess my race.  Then, I told the students to say their name and guess the race of the person sitting to the right of them.  Discussions were in a group but when a student asked me a question, another student would speak up to give the student an answer.  Even though I was cut off from my response, I was glad that students were willing to participate.  

Giving personal examples caught the students' attention because they were able to connect my examples to their experiences.  The connection we had made them want to share their thoughts.  It was a great experience because the purpose of having eight slides was to have a workshop that was geared towards the students' participation rather than a lecture format.  Students understood the material and did not hesitate to ask questions if they were confused.  In addition, one student challenged me and asked "why?" whenever I gave my point of view on a certain topic.  The conversations and engagement were rich and thoughtful.  Seeing the eagerness of the students made me feel like I made a difference in how they originally thought of the topic.


Although the third learning outcome is my lowest grade, I am happy that I had the chance to reflect on my experience.  I enjoyed being a conductor and having the opportunity to discuss an issue that is important to me.  Even though there were only four students including the sit in, the experience helped me overcome my fears of public speaking and it helped students see other people's point of views on racism.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Fall 2012 MSHE Retreat

Title: Master's of Science in Higher Education Retreat

Term: Fall, 2012

Description:  The MSHE Retreat took place at Sacred Heart Retreat Center in Big Bear Lake, California.  The two day retreat was from Friday September 14 to Saturday September 15, 2012.  The description of the event is as follows: The purpose of the retreat is to support and guide the students in developing a cohort base that will sustain them through the program and their profession after graduation, and provide an opportunity for students to explore, reflect, and create a plan for success.  

Learning Outcomes: In order to break free from my comfort zone and learn more about myself, the following learning outcomes were created:
  • SWiBAT  Learn and memorize all the names of the members of my cohort and the faculty of the Higher Education program.
  • SWiBAT Overcome my shyness as an introvert by approaching and initiating conversations in addition to keeping the conversation flowing as much as possible.
  • SWiBAT Discover: my strengths, weaknesses, and goals for the program.
Assessment Rubric: You can access my assessment rubric at the following link  MSHE Retreat Rubric
In addition, here are the links to a skit I performed in and photos of the retreat:
A Disciplined Community SkitRetreat Photos

Evidence: An icebreaker that involved learning and memorizing everyone's names helped me with my first learning outcome.  In addition to the activity, I always tried to say the name of an individual before starting a conversation to better help me remember names with faces.  I give myself a "4-advanced" because by the end of the retreat, I was able to remember all nineteen of the members of my cohort and the faculty of the program.

Due to previous experiences this past summer of acting as an extrovert and coming off as an unlikeable person, it was difficult for me to approach people and start conversations.  I was afraid of their judgment if I came off as too opinionated or annoying.  With this, I give myself a "2-basic" because I had conversations throughout the retreat but most of them occurred due to other people's efforts and I rarely tried to continue conversations.  Whenever I started conversations, they were short and simple.  

Through various discussions and activities, I was able to accomplish my third learning outcome.  My strengths were:  Includer, Communication, Relator, Restorative, and Developer.  These strengths were discovered from the Strengthsfinder 2.0 by Tom Rath and were discussed with partners and in a large group.  My weaknesses and goals were found when I reflected on my experiences in the program, especially in the retreat.  With this, I give myself a "4-advanced" because I was well aware of my strengths, weaknesses, and goals to help me become a better leader. 

Reflection: Learning all the names of the members of my cohort and the faculty of the program was a big accomplishment for me because I am good at remembering faces but have difficulty putting a name to a face.  I was happy with the results of my first learning outcome because it was a lot easier than I imagined, especially in the short period of time I had with the cohort and faculty members.

I was disappointed with my efforts to start conversations and continuing them because I thought I would have done better.  My fears of my summer experience as coming off as too opinionated and annoying with the new people I met, held me back from accomplishing the second learning outcome.  It showed that I did not learn from my experiences and I allowed them to affect me and my interactions with others.  I plan to approach more of my peers and faculty members in order to build relationships with them after the retreat.  It is better to be late than to never start at all.

My strengths' common theme lies heavily on assisting and serving others.  Rather than having strengths which display positive qualities of myself, they stress the importance of helping others realize their strengths, importance and comfort.  After  having countless experiences of helping friends and family with their personal problems, I was not surprised that my strengths revolved around the betterment of others but I did not know that those were considered strengths.  After discovering them, I will use them to help me overcome my weakness of a low self-esteem, a low self-confidence, and a sense of insecurity.  With this, I plan to focus on my strengths which in turn would diminish my weakness and help me with my goals of doing my best to finish the program without any regrets.  I strongly believe that the MSHE program will help me challenge myself and give me opportunities to learn more about myself so that I can be a better leader.